2024 Volleyball Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Volleyball Articles
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 2 | 846.912 |
|
2 | 3-0 | 2 | 837.500 | 3 | 827.638 |
|
3 | 4-0 | 3 | 794.167 | 5 | 809.335 |
|
4 | 5-0 | 5 | 707.500 | 4 | 819.254 |
|
5 | 6-0 | 11 | 620.833 | 1 | 848.796 |
|
6 | 3-2 | 7 | 651.778 | 6 | 776.212 |
|
7 | 4-2 | 4 | 715.056 | 16 | 630.470 |
|
8 | 3-1 | 12 | 611.875 | 10 | 674.291 |
|
9 | 3-1 | 16 | 595.455 | 9 | 684.174 |
|
10 | 3-1 | 13 | 606.629 | 14 | 639.971 |
|
11 | 6-4 | 15 | 598.049 | 13 | 654.677 |
|
12 | 3-2 | 6 | 652.826 | 24 | 568.827 |
|
13 | 2-0 | 26 | 512.500 | 7 | 700.010 |
|
14 | 2-1 | 18 | 587.582 | 15 | 631.946 |
|
15 | 2-0 | 26 | 512.500 | 12 | 656.088 |
|
16 | 1-0 | 19 | 566.667 | 20 | 606.644 |
|
17 | 3-2 | 17 | 588.051 | 22 | 597.118 |
|
18 | 3-1 | 25 | 528.728 | 18 | 619.152 |
|
19 | 3-1 | 20 | 541.732 | 23 | 594.082 |
|
20 | 0-3 | 8 | 650.000 | 35 | 398.751 |
|
21 | 2-0 | 37 | 350.000 | 8 | 696.253 |
|
22 | 1-2 | 14 | 605.556 | 31 | 463.495 |
|
23 | 0-2 | 8 | 650.000 | 37 | 386.262 |
|
24 | 2-0 | 37 | 350.000 | 11 | 663.463 |
|
25 | 3-2 | 21 | 535.000 | 27 | 521.739 |
|
26 | 0-3 | 8 | 650.000 | 42 | 336.545 |
|
27 | 4-2 | 32 | 461.667 | 19 | 612.307 |
|
28 | 1-1 | 23 | 532.500 | 30 | 495.433 |
|
29 | 1-0 | 37 | 350.000 | 17 | 622.618 |
|
30 | 1-2 | 22 | 533.333 | 32 | 450.213 |
|
31 | 1-1 | 29 | 500.000 | 28 | 518.889 |
|
32 | 1-0 | 37 | 350.000 | 21 | 605.769 |
|
33 | 2-1 | 34 | 435.417 | 26 | 532.481 |
|
34 | 2-4 | 28 | 503.657 | 33 | 432.105 |
|
35 | 1-0 | 37 | 350.000 | 25 | 558.046 |
|
36 | 3-2 | 35 | 426.667 | 29 | 506.319 |
|
37 | 1-4 | 24 | 532.158 | 40 | 364.744 |
|
38 | 1-2 | 33 | 441.667 | 34 | 419.048 |
|
39 | 0-2 | 30 | 487.500 | 38 | 367.853 |
|
40 | 0-2 | 30 | 487.500 | 44 | 317.308 |
|
41 | 1-2 | 42 | 326.042 | 36 | 394.466 |
|
42 | 1-3 | 36 | 375.833 | 43 | 319.933 |
|
43 | 0-1 | 43 | 325.000 | 39 | 365.706 |
|
44 | 2-3 | 46 | 264.615 | 41 | 351.261 |
|
45 | 1-3 | 45 | 271.936 | 45 | 298.211 |
|
46 | 0-4 | 43 | 325.000 | 50 | 174.138 |
|
47 | 0-2 | 48 | 216.667 | 46 | 267.341 |
|
48 | 0-2 | 49 | 162.500 | 47 | 256.302 |
|
49 | 0-3 | 47 | 252.778 | 49 | 181.774 |
|
50 | 0-2 | 50 | 0.000 | 48 | 233.356 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 2 | 765.278 | 1 | 855.747 |
|
2 | 4-2 | 3 | 692.768 | 3 | 705.779 |
|
3 | 3-1 | 4 | 685.000 | 4 | 694.736 |
|
4 | 5-1 | 7 | 643.864 | 2 | 734.806 |
|
5 | 1-1 | 1 | 840.909 | 9 | 572.847 |
|
6 | 2-0 | 10 | 512.500 | 5 | 662.015 |
|
7 | 1-1 | 9 | 515.909 | 6 | 608.612 |
|
8 | 1-2 | 6 | 649.359 | 10 | 521.442 |
|
9 | 3-1 | 11 | 506.524 | 7 | 603.292 |
|
10 | 0-1 | 5 | 650.000 | 18 | 387.338 |
|
11 | 1-1 | 13 | 465.000 | 11 | 520.217 |
|
12 | 1-0 | 21 | 350.000 | 8 | 581.289 |
|
13 | 1-2 | 8 | 558.333 | 21 | 346.917 |
|
14 | 1-2 | 15 | 434.085 | 15 | 438.579 |
|
15 | 2-3 | 14 | 442.333 | 17 | 410.656 |
|
16 | 0-3 | 12 | 479.074 | 22 | 339.991 |
|
17 | 1-1 | 23 | 320.556 | 13 | 473.262 |
|
18 | 0-1 | 16 | 433.333 | 20 | 367.764 |
|
19 | 2-3 | 22 | 341.667 | 16 | 438.009 |
|
20 | 0-3 | 18 | 430.926 | 23 | 326.005 |
|
21 | 0-1 | 30 | 0.000 | 12 | 500.000 |
|
22 | 1-1 | 28 | 140.000 | 14 | 444.817 |
|
23 | 2-3 | 24 | 303.222 | 19 | 380.873 |
|
24 | 1-3 | 19 | 408.681 | 24 | 321.583 |
|
25 | 0-4 | 16 | 433.333 | 27 | 258.884 |
|
26 | 0-2 | 20 | 406.250 | 26 | 260.722 |
|
27 | 1-2 | 25 | 253.819 | 25 | 292.947 |
|
28 | 0-2 | 27 | 162.500 | 28 | 243.868 |
|
29 | 0-4 | 26 | 230.208 | 29 | 234.299 |
|
30 | 0-2 | 29 | 81.250 | 30 | 206.423 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-0 | 1 | 756.250 | 1 | 847.018 |
|
2 | 6-1 | 3 | 672.976 | 2 | 822.133 |
|
3 | 2-1 | 6 | 641.458 | 6 | 629.960 |
|
4 | 3-3 | 5 | 643.324 | 7 | 596.050 |
|
5 | 2-2 | 2 | 703.125 | 10 | 508.348 |
|
6 | 3-1 | 11 | 528.728 | 4 | 639.144 |
|
7 | 2-3 | 7 | 618.750 | 8 | 563.761 |
|
8 | 4-0 | 15 | 485.417 | 3 | 721.236 |
|
9 | 1-2 | 8 | 593.472 | 13 | 489.979 |
|
10 | 2-2 | 9 | 585.208 | 14 | 483.824 |
|
11 | 2-3 | 17 | 460.077 | 9 | 530.282 |
|
12 | 1-2 | 10 | 541.026 | 16 | 481.147 |
|
13 | 0-1 | 4 | 650.000 | 23 | 407.079 |
|
14 | 2-0 | 24 | 350.000 | 5 | 630.284 |
|
15 | 2-2 | 18 | 452.873 | 15 | 483.226 |
|
16 | 1-1 | 16 | 467.500 | 17 | 480.741 |
|
17 | 0-1 | 13 | 487.500 | 20 | 438.412 |
|
18 | 2-5 | 12 | 492.904 | 22 | 431.947 |
|
19 | 1-2 | 27 | 116.667 | 11 | 500.000 |
|
20 | 0-1 | 28 | 0.000 | 11 | 500.000 |
|
21 | 1-2 | 21 | 383.750 | 19 | 457.082 |
|
22 | 1-2 | 20 | 402.083 | 21 | 433.292 |
|
23 | 0-2 | 13 | 487.500 | 29 | 289.305 |
|
24 | 1-1 | 26 | 248.333 | 18 | 476.728 |
|
25 | 0-2 | 19 | 406.250 | 27 | 312.880 |
|
26 | 0-4 | 23 | 352.083 | 26 | 317.719 |
|
27 | 0-1 | 28 | 0.000 | 24 | 327.049 |
|
28 | 0-4 | 22 | 379.167 | 30 | 231.830 |
|
29 | 0-1 | 28 | 0.000 | 25 | 326.914 |
|
30 | 0-2 | 25 | 325.000 | 28 | 294.580 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 6-0 | 2 | 785.500 | 1 | 951.330 |
|
2 | 5-0 | 1 | 870.000 | 2 | 902.850 |
|
3 | 4-0 | 8 | 729.167 | 3 | 861.206 |
|
4 | 4-1 | 7 | 732.083 | 5 | 810.086 |
|
5 | 7-0 | 9 | 705.952 | 4 | 827.314 |
|
6 | 4-1 | 6 | 733.297 | 7 | 762.664 |
|
7 | 1-1 | 3 | 778.750 | 15 | 563.298 |
|
8 | 2-0 | 12 | 675.000 | 9 | 714.791 |
|
9 | 2-1 | 11 | 694.444 | 10 | 699.012 |
|
10 | 3-0 | 16 | 638.889 | 6 | 766.146 |
|
11 | 1-2 | 5 | 737.917 | 18 | 548.134 |
|
12 | 2-0 | 12 | 675.000 | 13 | 609.732 |
|
13 | 3-2 | 15 | 640.741 | 12 | 644.736 |
|
14 | 1-1 | 4 | 760.000 | 27 | 467.617 |
|
15 | 2-0 | 24 | 512.500 | 8 | 740.937 |
|
16 | 2-0 | 21 | 566.667 | 11 | 697.779 |
|
17 | 1-2 | 10 | 703.526 | 23 | 492.892 |
|
18 | 2-2 | 22 | 563.377 | 17 | 552.170 |
|
19 | 1-1 | 23 | 562.500 | 19 | 528.717 |
|
20 | 2-3 | 17 | 594.872 | 26 | 482.555 |
|
21 | 2-1 | 30 | 486.471 | 14 | 582.896 |
|
22 | 1-1 | 27 | 500.000 | 21 | 517.379 |
|
23 | 0-2 | 14 | 650.000 | 34 | 400.536 |
|
24 | 2-3 | 34 | 428.000 | 16 | 563.211 |
|
25 | 2-2 | 26 | 502.367 | 24 | 486.324 |
|
26 | 1-2 | 29 | 486.859 | 22 | 500.000 |
|
27 | 1-3 | 25 | 504.309 | 28 | 464.134 |
|
28 | 1-3 | 18 | 592.500 | 35 | 398.811 |
|
29 | 1-3 | 20 | 584.722 | 37 | 381.579 |
|
30 | 1-2 | 19 | 586.111 | 40 | 342.438 |
|
31 | 4-3 | 31 | 470.578 | 29 | 442.571 |
|
32 | 2-2 | 36 | 410.417 | 25 | 482.836 |
|
33 | 2-1 | 44 | 200.000 | 20 | 521.382 |
|
34 | 2-1 | 35 | 413.889 | 31 | 421.401 |
|
35 | 1-3 | 32 | 443.403 | 36 | 397.049 |
|
36 | 0-2 | 28 | 487.500 | 41 | 304.790 |
|
37 | 1-1 | 40 | 337.500 | 30 | 435.652 |
|
38 | 2-2 | 41 | 335.695 | 33 | 414.834 |
|
39 | 0-2 | 33 | 433.333 | 42 | 295.042 |
|
40 | 1-1 | 45 | 175.000 | 32 | 419.640 |
|
41 | 1-2 | 39 | 341.190 | 38 | 372.806 |
|
42 | 1-2 | 37 | 402.083 | 46 | 249.716 |
|
43 | 0-3 | 46 | 108.333 | 39 | 347.938 |
|
44 | 1-2 | 42 | 333.333 | 43 | 287.255 |
|
45 | 1-6 | 38 | 374.943 | 47 | 126.619 |
|
46 | 1-3 | 43 | 306.548 | 45 | 259.848 |
|
47 | 0-2 | 47 | 0.000 | 44 | 276.399 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-0 | 2 | 783.333 | 1 | 857.666 |
|
2 | 5-1 | 1 | 838.636 | 4 | 763.195 |
|
3 | 4-0 | 4 | 750.060 | 2 | 847.924 |
|
4 | 2-0 | 3 | 756.250 | 3 | 809.186 |
|
5 | 2-0 | 6 | 702.083 | 5 | 750.419 |
|
6 | 3-2 | 5 | 709.583 | 6 | 713.925 |
|
7 | 5-2 | 10 | 620.256 | 8 | 674.224 |
|
8 | 2-1 | 8 | 640.278 | 11 | 642.888 |
|
9 | 5-2 | 11 | 599.892 | 9 | 663.792 |
|
10 | 3-0 | 15 | 520.238 | 7 | 697.838 |
|
11 | 4-1 | 12 | 590.048 | 10 | 653.892 |
|
12 | 2-2 | 7 | 670.139 | 18 | 524.150 |
|
13 | 3-1 | 14 | 538.785 | 13 | 627.334 |
|
14 | 2-0 | 17 | 512.500 | 12 | 629.138 |
|
15 | 1-2 | 9 | 629.853 | 21 | 444.579 |
|
16 | 5-4 | 20 | 488.568 | 15 | 544.064 |
|
17 | 3-3 | 19 | 499.236 | 16 | 528.294 |
|
18 | 1-1 | 18 | 502.222 | 17 | 525.430 |
|
19 | 2-3 | 16 | 514.167 | 19 | 500.836 |
|
20 | 5-2 | 24 | 454.188 | 14 | 585.356 |
|
21 | 0-1 | 13 | 541.667 | 25 | 424.033 |
|
22 | 1-4 | 21 | 487.754 | 24 | 431.516 |
|
23 | 1-2 | 23 | 477.778 | 23 | 432.717 |
|
24 | 3-5 | 22 | 486.903 | 26 | 386.016 |
|
25 | 2-2 | 27 | 418.750 | 22 | 440.163 |
|
26 | 1-3 | 28 | 409.367 | 27 | 358.388 |
|
27 | 1-5 | 26 | 420.139 | 30 | 338.418 |
|
28 | 1-4 | 25 | 437.833 | 31 | 337.884 |
|
29 | 0-1 | 37 | 216.667 | 20 | 500.000 |
|
30 | 0-1 | 34 | 325.000 | 28 | 349.979 |
|
31 | 1-2 | 31 | 366.667 | 32 | 325.712 |
|
32 | 1-3 | 30 | 372.091 | 35 | 253.553 |
|
33 | 1-5 | 29 | 380.787 | 36 | 245.816 |
|
34 | 0-1 | 39 | 0.000 | 29 | 342.109 |
|
35 | 0-2 | 36 | 297.917 | 34 | 305.435 |
|
36 | 2-6 | 33 | 328.926 | 37 | 245.601 |
|
37 | 0-3 | 32 | 339.444 | 38 | 231.543 |
|
38 | 0-1 | 39 | 0.000 | 33 | 310.906 |
|
39 | 0-4 | 35 | 308.750 | 39 | 188.670 |
|
40 | 0-3 | 38 | 175.397 | 40 | 130.770 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 5-0 | 4 | 747.583 | 1 | 881.194 |
|
2 | 1-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 7 | 756.441 |
|
3 | 4-0 | 7 | 680.417 | 4 | 781.009 |
|
4 | 2-0 | 3 | 783.333 | 8 | 749.112 |
|
5 | 3-1 | 13 | 642.917 | 2 | 848.772 |
|
6 | 6-1 | 6 | 702.997 | 9 | 744.000 |
|
7 | 1-0 | 1 | 1000.000 | 14 | 689.599 |
|
8 | 6-2 | 14 | 629.954 | 3 | 799.596 |
|
9 | 6-1 | 15 | 626.389 | 6 | 769.324 |
|
10 | 2-1 | 5 | 724.306 | 16 | 672.312 |
|
11 | 4-0 | 17 | 609.226 | 5 | 769.438 |
|
12 | 7-2 | 11 | 648.050 | 11 | 714.740 |
|
13 | 5-2 | 18 | 598.795 | 12 | 700.652 |
|
14 | 1-1 | 8 | 665.000 | 28 | 552.957 |
|
15 | 3-0 | 19 | 593.750 | 18 | 648.635 |
|
16 | 5-1 | 25 | 550.347 | 13 | 691.833 |
|
17 | 1-1 | 9 | 662.500 | 30 | 548.349 |
|
18 | 1-0 | 23 | 566.667 | 19 | 646.698 |
|
19 | 5-2 | 16 | 617.174 | 26 | 571.387 |
|
20 | 3-1 | 34 | 482.143 | 10 | 734.985 |
|
21 | 2-2 | 30 | 510.986 | 15 | 679.631 |
|
22 | 6-3 | 24 | 553.879 | 21 | 631.489 |
|
23 | 3-1 | 22 | 567.679 | 24 | 611.890 |
|
24 | 0-1 | 10 | 650.000 | 36 | 500.000 |
|
25 | 2-2 | 12 | 646.667 | 35 | 500.016 |
|
26 | 5-3 | 31 | 508.813 | 17 | 669.705 |
|
27 | 2-1 | 21 | 570.833 | 29 | 550.822 |
|
28 | 2-1 | 28 | 522.582 | 23 | 622.537 |
|
29 | 1-3 | 20 | 590.439 | 39 | 449.067 |
|
30 | 4-1 | 33 | 488.270 | 27 | 568.798 |
|
31 | 3-2 | 29 | 514.333 | 33 | 506.137 |
|
32 | 1-3 | 27 | 530.417 | 41 | 440.095 |
|
33 | 2-3 | 37 | 458.963 | 32 | 509.863 |
|
34 | 3-2 | 35 | 477.992 | 34 | 505.068 |
|
35 | 3-1 | 39 | 434.375 | 31 | 510.955 |
|
36 | 0-1 | 26 | 541.667 | 44 | 423.108 |
|
37 | 2-2 | 36 | 476.711 | 38 | 463.919 |
|
38 | 3-1 | 54 | 368.229 | 25 | 581.800 |
|
39 | 2-1 | 60 | 326.190 | 20 | 639.307 |
|
40 | 1-0 | 58 | 350.000 | 22 | 625.000 |
|
41 | 3-3 | 38 | 458.333 | 45 | 418.233 |
|
42 | 2-3 | 46 | 412.381 | 40 | 444.286 |
|
43 | 3-4 | 41 | 426.310 | 46 | 413.265 |
|
44 | 0-1 | 40 | 433.333 | 48 | 370.630 |
|
45 | 2-2 | 52 | 378.125 | 37 | 489.845 |
|
46 | 2-2 | 48 | 400.000 | 43 | 425.078 |
|
47 | 1-2 | 42 | 423.504 | 51 | 326.272 |
|
48 | 1-4 | 32 | 490.218 | 64 | 237.088 |
|
49 | 2-4 | 55 | 361.806 | 42 | 430.821 |
|
50 | 3-5 | 47 | 410.950 | 50 | 364.734 |
|
51 | 0-2 | 43 | 419.792 | 57 | 303.322 |
|
51 | 0-2 | 43 | 419.792 | 57 | 303.322 |
|
53 | 1-2 | 53 | 377.778 | 49 | 365.905 |
|
54 | 1-5 | 45 | 417.088 | 61 | 279.735 |
|
55 | 1-3 | 56 | 359.583 | 54 | 317.866 |
|
56 | 0-3 | 51 | 388.194 | 62 | 252.665 |
|
57 | 0-3 | 50 | 390.000 | 63 | 241.911 |
|
58 | 0-5 | 49 | 394.643 | 65 | 192.494 |
|
59 | 0-4 | 68 | 162.500 | 47 | 375.000 |
|
60 | 0-1 | 63 | 216.667 | 52 | 321.306 |
|
60 | 0-1 | 63 | 216.667 | 52 | 321.306 |
|
62 | 1-2 | 61 | 325.000 | 55 | 314.892 |
|
63 | 0-1 | 63 | 216.667 | 56 | 304.422 |
|
64 | 0-3 | 59 | 343.056 | 60 | 286.522 |
|
65 | 0-6 | 57 | 350.278 | 66 | 177.193 |
|
66 | 0-1 | 67 | 185.714 | 59 | 303.251 |
|
67 | 1-4 | 62 | 218.333 | 67 | 164.809 |
|
68 | 1-5 | 66 | 210.476 | 68 | 88.401 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)