2024 Boys Soccer Rankings
Click here for OSAAtoday Soccer Articles
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 4-0 | 2 | 749.479 | 1 | 841.964 |
|
2 | 3-0-2 | 1 | 767.564 | 2 | 827.735 |
|
3 | 4-0-1 | 5 | 717.417 | 3 | 825.125 |
|
4 | 3-0-1 | 3 | 737.674 | 5 | 812.490 |
|
5 | 4-1 | 6 | 705.614 | 4 | 818.285 |
|
6 | 4-1 | 4 | 731.500 | 6 | 792.281 |
|
7 | 4-0 | 8 | 695.313 | 7 | 784.523 |
|
8 | 2-1-2 | 7 | 703.750 | 14 | 669.773 |
|
9 | 4-1 | 12 | 627.614 | 10 | 725.327 |
|
10 | 4-1 | 10 | 655.667 | 12 | 693.526 |
|
11 | 2-1-1 | 9 | 681.076 | 15 | 663.768 |
|
12 | 4-0-1 | 17 | 604.744 | 8 | 774.889 |
|
13 | 4-1 | 16 | 605.064 | 11 | 715.774 |
|
14 | 2-0-2 | 13 | 622.538 | 16 | 661.337 |
|
15 | 4-1 | 21 | 585.364 | 9 | 725.506 |
|
16 | 4-1 | 19 | 594.231 | 13 | 692.297 |
|
17 | 3-2 | 14 | 610.667 | 18 | 622.191 |
|
18 | 1-1-1 | 11 | 647.778 | 23 | 555.678 |
|
19 | 3-1 | 22 | 583.681 | 17 | 654.576 |
|
20 | 2-2 | 20 | 589.716 | 21 | 588.465 |
|
21 | 1-1-2 | 15 | 605.625 | 28 | 528.693 |
|
22 | 1-1-2 | 18 | 598.750 | 27 | 529.711 |
|
23 | 3-2 | 27 | 534.583 | 19 | 603.440 |
|
24 | 3-1 | 28 | 529.167 | 20 | 600.168 |
|
25 | 2-2-1 | 25 | 565.000 | 26 | 533.259 |
|
26 | 2-1-1 | 32 | 476.042 | 22 | 572.361 |
|
27 | 3-1 | 30 | 515.972 | 24 | 553.229 |
|
28 | 1-1-1 | 23 | 581.250 | 31 | 509.277 |
|
29 | 2-2-1 | 26 | 545.962 | 29 | 528.133 |
|
30 | 1-1-1 | 29 | 518.056 | 30 | 521.979 |
|
31 | 1-3 | 24 | 565.278 | 35 | 443.598 |
|
32 | 3-2 | 38 | 442.885 | 25 | 535.710 |
|
33 | 2-2 | 34 | 459.375 | 33 | 480.533 |
|
34 | 1-3 | 31 | 481.392 | 37 | 383.408 |
|
35 | 2-3 | 35 | 458.750 | 34 | 449.601 |
|
36 | 1-2-2 | 33 | 459.615 | 36 | 398.540 |
|
37 | 3-1-1 | 44 | 345.417 | 32 | 493.858 |
|
38 | 1-4 | 36 | 448.333 | 42 | 349.161 |
|
39 | 2-4 | 40 | 429.028 | 39 | 364.066 |
|
40 | 2-3 | 43 | 362.500 | 38 | 369.115 |
|
41 | 1-2 | 42 | 384.028 | 40 | 361.299 |
|
42 | 1-4 | 41 | 410.303 | 41 | 357.651 |
|
43 | 0-4-1 | 37 | 444.468 | 46 | 253.906 |
|
44 | 0-3 | 39 | 442.361 | 45 | 282.153 |
|
45 | 0-3-2 | 45 | 338.141 | 44 | 284.662 |
|
46 | 1-2-2 | 47 | 266.667 | 43 | 333.660 |
|
47 | 0-4-1 | 46 | 322.417 | 47 | 192.595 |
|
48 | 0-3 | 48 | 252.778 | 48 | 171.470 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 3 | 653.333 | 2 | 739.285 |
|
2 | 2-2-1 | 1 | 727.841 | 4 | 683.856 |
|
3 | 4-0 | 8 | 599.167 | 1 | 795.204 |
|
4 | 1-1-1 | 2 | 662.500 | 7 | 582.245 |
|
5 | 1-0-2 | 6 | 613.194 | 5 | 632.889 |
|
6 | 2-2 | 4 | 624.242 | 8 | 540.434 |
|
7 | 5-0-1 | 10 | 546.042 | 3 | 687.581 |
|
8 | 3-2 | 7 | 605.385 | 6 | 622.716 |
|
9 | 1-4-1 | 5 | 622.396 | 11 | 508.399 |
|
10 | 2-2 | 14 | 472.917 | 9 | 520.907 |
|
11 | 1-2 | 9 | 555.556 | 14 | 461.850 |
|
12 | 3-2 | 17 | 452.635 | 10 | 511.015 |
|
13 | 1-2 | 11 | 515.278 | 17 | 437.404 |
|
14 | 1-3-1 | 13 | 495.000 | 20 | 390.110 |
|
15 | 2-2-1 | 19 | 432.833 | 15 | 461.523 |
|
16 | 2-4 | 16 | 458.819 | 18 | 397.781 |
|
17 | 2-2 | 22 | 418.750 | 13 | 476.665 |
|
18 | 3-2 | 24 | 394.135 | 12 | 492.469 |
|
19 | 1-3 | 12 | 503.333 | 24 | 356.670 |
|
20 | 1-2-2 | 21 | 430.000 | 16 | 445.331 |
|
21 | 1-3 | 18 | 435.625 | 22 | 368.580 |
|
22 | 1-4 | 15 | 462.414 | 25 | 342.752 |
|
23 | 1-2 | 20 | 430.833 | 21 | 384.094 |
|
24 | 2-2 | 27 | 351.042 | 19 | 394.473 |
|
25 | 1-2 | 25 | 391.250 | 23 | 361.242 |
|
26 | 1-2-1 | 23 | 394.271 | 26 | 340.767 |
|
27 | 2-3 | 28 | 327.667 | 28 | 312.586 |
|
28 | 1-5 | 26 | 354.514 | 30 | 246.917 |
|
29 | 1-2-1 | 30 | 275.417 | 27 | 325.444 |
|
30 | 0-2 | 29 | 325.000 | 29 | 261.932 |
|
31 | 0-3 | 31 | 207.639 | 31 | 169.144 |
|
32 | 0-4 | 32 | 182.813 | 32 | 106.364 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 3-0 | 1 | 783.333 | 1 | 866.561 |
|
2 | 2-0 | 2 | 772.500 | 2 | 768.173 |
|
3 | 3-2 | 5 | 636.576 | 4 | 716.633 |
|
4 | 3-0-1 | 7 | 619.063 | 3 | 760.584 |
|
5 | 4-2 | 4 | 640.278 | 8 | 650.111 |
|
6 | 2-1 | 3 | 683.333 | 9 | 636.753 |
|
7 | 3-0 | 12 | 566.667 | 5 | 707.328 |
|
8 | 2-1 | 6 | 630.556 | 12 | 550.020 |
|
9 | 2-3 | 8 | 603.939 | 14 | 508.547 |
|
10 | 2-1-1 | 14 | 537.813 | 10 | 618.795 |
|
11 | 2-3 | 10 | 570.356 | 18 | 479.461 |
|
12 | 3-0 | 23 | 431.250 | 6 | 684.496 |
|
13 | 2-1 | 16 | 529.306 | 13 | 530.013 |
|
14 | 3-0-1 | 24 | 430.104 | 7 | 671.241 |
|
15 | 2-1 | 21 | 476.250 | 11 | 601.428 |
|
16 | 1-2 | 11 | 568.056 | 21 | 422.581 |
|
17 | 1-1 | 18 | 507.917 | 15 | 488.475 |
|
18 | 0-3-2 | 13 | 561.208 | 22 | 413.975 |
|
19 | 1-4 | 9 | 573.333 | 26 | 353.097 |
|
20 | 1-1 | 20 | 491.875 | 16 | 481.928 |
|
21 | 2-2 | 19 | 495.069 | 17 | 481.184 |
|
22 | 0-1-1 | 17 | 511.250 | 24 | 376.422 |
|
23 | 1-3 | 15 | 536.508 | 27 | 338.934 |
|
24 | 1-1-1 | 25 | 429.375 | 19 | 470.800 |
|
25 | 0-2-1 | 22 | 455.556 | 25 | 361.796 |
|
26 | 2-2 | 28 | 296.875 | 20 | 445.352 |
|
27 | 1-2 | 26 | 420.000 | 23 | 387.603 |
|
28 | 0-4-1 | 27 | 365.385 | 30 | 230.448 |
|
29 | 2-2 | 31 | 186.111 | 28 | 295.469 |
|
30 | 1-3-1 | 30 | 192.273 | 29 | 277.601 |
|
31 | 0-6 | 29 | 225.694 | 32 | 134.597 |
|
32 | 0-3 | 32 | 126.389 | 31 | 173.392 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)
Team Name & Logo League |
OSAA Ranking |
Overall Record |
RPI Rank |
RPI Rating |
Colley Rank |
Colley Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1 | 5-0-1 | 1 | 819.583 | 2 | 931.314 |
|
2 | 6-0 | 3 | 799.583 | 1 | 966.322 |
|
3 | 5-0 | 2 | 805.000 | 3 | 898.728 |
|
4 | 4-0-1 | 5 | 761.365 | 4 | 851.202 |
|
5 | 3-0-1 | 4 | 775.417 | 7 | 760.861 |
|
6 | 5-0 | 10 | 677.167 | 6 | 816.095 |
|
7 | 3-1 | 6 | 739.410 | 10 | 714.590 |
|
8 | 5-0 | 12 | 664.167 | 5 | 829.483 |
|
9 | 4-1 | 9 | 692.614 | 11 | 702.437 |
|
10 | 1-1-1 | 8 | 694.792 | 17 | 610.595 |
|
11 | 3-0 | 18 | 611.806 | 9 | 724.278 |
|
12 | 4-2 | 15 | 621.474 | 12 | 702.284 |
|
13 | 2-2-1 | 14 | 633.250 | 15 | 637.353 |
|
14 | 2-1 | 16 | 620.139 | 16 | 637.226 |
|
15 | 4-0 | 25 | 553.125 | 8 | 743.841 |
|
16 | 2-2 | 13 | 635.417 | 21 | 571.821 |
|
17 | 4-1 | 22 | 583.237 | 13 | 670.917 |
|
18 | 2-0-1 | 21 | 588.889 | 14 | 643.558 |
|
19 | 2-3 | 11 | 665.449 | 26 | 550.793 |
|
20 | 2-2-1 | 19 | 606.167 | 19 | 608.179 |
|
21 | 2-2-2 | 20 | 591.319 | 25 | 561.053 |
|
22 | 1-1 | 17 | 616.250 | 31 | 524.019 |
|
23 | 2-1 | 28 | 538.889 | 22 | 569.352 |
|
24 | 2-1 | 23 | 561.806 | 27 | 547.266 |
|
25 | 3-1 | 31 | 511.837 | 20 | 576.753 |
|
26 | 2-1-1 | 29 | 538.021 | 24 | 567.104 |
|
27 | 3-4 | 24 | 555.615 | 29 | 532.016 |
|
28 | 0-2-1 | 7 | 715.625 | 46 | 381.678 |
|
29 | 2-1 | 36 | 476.250 | 23 | 567.628 |
|
30 | 2-1-1 | 32 | 511.806 | 30 | 528.883 |
|
31 | 2-2-1 | 30 | 519.500 | 32 | 508.935 |
|
32 | 1-3-1 | 26 | 550.000 | 37 | 423.718 |
|
33 | 2-1 | 42 | 413.750 | 28 | 535.786 |
|
34 | 2-2-1 | 38 | 454.475 | 33 | 506.600 |
|
35 | 0-2-1 | 27 | 545.833 | 45 | 383.531 |
|
36 | 1-3-1 | 34 | 485.455 | 39 | 410.014 |
|
37 | 2-0-1 | 57 | 300.000 | 18 | 608.422 |
|
38 | 2-1-1 | 41 | 417.014 | 34 | 501.141 |
|
39 | 2-1-1 | 40 | 423.854 | 35 | 469.010 |
|
40 | 3-3 | 39 | 432.222 | 36 | 464.811 |
|
41 | 1-2 | 35 | 477.778 | 40 | 402.196 |
|
42 | 1-3-1 | 37 | 462.564 | 41 | 399.721 |
|
43 | 1-1 | 33 | 487.500 | 47 | 381.186 |
|
44 | 1-2 | 47 | 370.833 | 43 | 393.386 |
|
45 | 1-1 | 56 | 305.000 | 38 | 415.163 |
|
46 | 2-4 | 44 | 402.083 | 50 | 354.411 |
|
47 | 1-4 | 43 | 409.792 | 51 | 337.951 |
|
48 | 1-2-1 | 53 | 343.125 | 42 | 397.111 |
|
49 | 1-1-1 | 51 | 355.556 | 44 | 384.953 |
|
50 | 2-3 | 50 | 357.083 | 48 | 367.124 |
|
51 | 1-2 | 52 | 344.306 | 49 | 359.114 |
|
52 | 0-2-1 | 46 | 372.917 | 58 | 273.724 |
|
53 | 0-2 | 48 | 365.625 | 57 | 278.756 |
|
54 | 1-3 | 54 | 313.750 | 52 | 330.004 |
|
55 | 0-5-1 | 45 | 398.750 | 61 | 228.128 |
|
56 | 0-5 | 49 | 362.917 | 62 | 196.533 |
|
57 | 0-2-1 | 59 | 269.583 | 54 | 315.685 |
|
58 | 1-4 | 58 | 294.341 | 55 | 298.743 |
|
59 | 2-2-1 | 62 | 228.083 | 53 | 323.898 |
|
60 | 0-4 | 55 | 311.458 | 64 | 162.317 |
|
61 | 1-2-1 | 65 | 197.917 | 56 | 286.981 |
|
62 | 1-3-1 | 63 | 216.026 | 60 | 244.876 |
|
63 | 0-4 | 61 | 243.750 | 63 | 192.512 |
|
64 | 0-3 | 66 | 166.369 | 59 | 266.248 |
|
65 | 0-6-1 | 60 | 265.347 | 65 | 138.621 |
|
66 | 0-4 | 64 | 209.896 | 66 | 90.516 |
Legend
OSAA Ranking: Official OSAA ranking, composed of the averaged RPI rank and Colley rank for all teams within the same classification.Overall Record: The team's overall play record is displayed in W-L or W-L-T format.
RPI Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by RPI Rating.
RPI Rating: A team's Rating Percentage Index (RPI) Rating = 35% × WWP + 65% × OWP.
Colley Rank: A numerical order of teams, ranked by Colley Rating.
Colley Rating: Rating calculated by Colley's bias free ranking method (only includes contests in classification and ± 1 classification away.)